Is It Art?

    

"You'd best be out of town before football season, though. 
All I can say is 'Fly, Eagles, Fly!'"

     A new exhibit has premiered in the Philadelphia Art Museum.  One which will last until September 1st.
      Touted as the leading edge representation of the human condition, “Body Worlds” is a show which consists of skinned human bodies (did I mention they were dead?) frozen in various activities like dribbling a basketball, riding a bicycle, or juggling pizzas.  To keep buzzards away from the front door, they’ve been injected with some sort of resin in a process called "plastination" which keeps them as stiff as Al Gore at the Senior Prom.

I'm guessing this is a boy. 
Although, with no junk, it's impossible to tell.

    The whole shebang is the brainchild of a German scientist, Gunther von Hagens.

Insert tasteless, yet predictable, joke here.

    Even though it strikes me as something of a freak show, it does a pretty good job of showing us what we actually look like inside (that would be gross).

     But, is it art?

     Fine art has always been somewhat of a mystery to me.  Whether an impressionist rendering of man’s inhumanity to circus peanuts or a Flintstones jelly glass, most art looks like it belongs in the “monkey flings poo” genre. 

Except Dogs Playing Poker. 
Now that's art!

    I’ve visited a buttload (not to be confused with the eminently larger “shitload”) of museums in my day from the finest New York galleries to what you can generally find scrawled on bathroom walls.  In each case, I study each exhibit, lost in deep thought as I pompously stroke my chin and wax eloquent to fellow museum mavens on what creative message the artist was trying to convey with his bold, dynamic blend of colors juxtaposed against the tragedies of our daily lives.

Then I realize it's a 'Piso Mojado" sign

    It’s not just paintings, either.  Unless it’s some Greek or Roman statue (identified primarily by missing arms or genitalia), most sculptures look like something a kid whipped up in his Play-Doh Fun Factory.

I'm fairly confident this is a girl, though.

    Take THIS ball of clay, smash it into another, differently-colored ball of clay, toss it into an oven and-voila!-we have the Creation of Man.  

Or Oprah

      OK, maybe I’m not the most sophisticated guy.  Maybe, to me, one of those velvet sad clown paintings, a “Beers of the World” jigsaw puzzle, or a statue of the Virgin Mary made of elbow macaroni are tres classy.     

    All this being said, though, there was this time where I looked at art for art’s sake and came away a better man for it.

    Quite a few years ago, I took a trip to Paris with some friends.  The City of Lights was nothing like I expected.  Clean and well-organized, its citizens were as friendly as can be (oops, sorry-that’s Epcot Center).

I learned that it's never a good idea to bend over in front of a French dog.

    Actually, though, we were treated very well, despite the sneezing powder in our escargot and the Jerry Lewis Marathon on the hotel TV (“All Jerry! All Day!").  At any rate, we were treated better than we probably deserved, given our propensity to amuse the unamuseable (is that even a word?) with our Pepe Le Pew impressions and our complaints of “You call THIS French Toast!?”

    While there, we did all the goofy things tourists are supposed to do:  gawk at the Eiffel Tower, marvel at the Arc d’Triomphe, sashay (or is that mosey?) down the Champs Elysee, and take in a show at the Moulin Rouge.

YOU know what kind of show I mean!

    After a week of carousing around the city, we grew tired of idling our way in tourist traps and cheesy trinket shops (Hey look! A statue of Napoleon made of butter!), we thought it would be a good idea to hit the Louvre.

    Even though my distaste for artsy stuff was well-known, I still thought I should give the most famous museum in the world a try.  What could it hurt?

    Plus, I might get to see some dinosaur bones or a mummy.  Cool.

    Unfortunately, we hadn’t given ourselves enough time to adequately tour the museum, as it is one huge momma.  We were practically forced to run through each of the galleries and, while I cannot be sure if one even exists, didn’t have time to see any caveman exhibits.

"Whaddya mean, we don't have to shave?"
"We're French cavemen.  Duh."

    Despite the seemingly endless assortment of objects d’arte, the main attraction of the Louvre is DaVinci’s Mona Lisa, so we determined that, if nothing else, we’d make sure to see the smiling lady. 

    Like a pack of bloodhounds fixed on the scent of a fleeing bank robber, we dashed through the museum, stopping only brief seconds to view anything which remotely caught our eye.

    Thank goodness there were signs leading to our destination; without them, we would have gotten hopelessly lost.  But, I’d sure like to catch that joker who swapped signs around.    

We wasted half an hour trying to find which stall hid the Mona Lisa.

    Finally, as we ran into the back of a huge queue (i.e., snooty ten dollar word for “line”), we arrived at our destination.  Somewhere up ahead was arguably the most famous painting in the world.  Even I was moved by the experience as we prepared to view history.

    As we drew closer though, we couldn’t help feeling letdown.  Rather than some huge production or jaw-dropping masterpiece, our Holy Grail came across as a bust.  Not much bigger than a postage stamp, the Mona Lisa was safely segregated from the crowd by Plexiglas and looked no more impressive than some kid’s paint-by-numbers set.  We felt that all the hype amounted to little more than a P.T. Barnum sham.

Yeah.  No fooling.

    Of course, we took the obligatory photographs, if for nothing else than to prove to our families we actually did more in Paris than drink cheap wine and wolf down cheese which smelled like stinky feet.

Among other things.

    Once done, we proceeded to look for an exit, our thirst for culture dashed and our feet weary from our madcap race through the Louvre Labyrinth.

    Shuffling into a huge gallery, we were startled by the many tapestries covering the walls.  An ancient smell of must hung in the air and we knew we were in the presence of masterpieces which were several hundred years old.

    One tapestry piqued our interest.  Despite being dulled from the passage of centuries, it excited our senses through its riotous display of colors and imaginative themes.

    Depicting the pomp and majesty of a king holding court, the tapestry illustrated dozens of courtiers (strangely, NONE of whom wore pants-except the king) and their ladies paying homage to their noble sovereign.

Plus, I could've sworn I saw half-men/half-goats chasing chickens.

    It was massive (that's what she said), as it fully covered one entire wall.

"Shoot, that thing'd never fit in the double-wide."

    Craning our necks to the ceiling in an effort to take in its full glory, our visit was vindicated by this wonderful expression of some unknown artist’s muse.  We stood, enthralled, knowing we were in the presence of something larger than ourselves.

    My concentration was quietly broken by one of my companions.  In one brief instant, he gave voice to a heartfelt sentiment.  A sentiment which shook me out of my revelry and brought me back to the role for which I am best suited:  Art Non-Snob.  A sentiment I knew was my own.

   “Gee, I wonder if you buy a couch to match it or buy it to match your couch?”

Or your collection of plastic dead guys?


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Happy Presidents Day!

 

Except Monday.
Suck it.

           WARNING: The following contains some truths, half-truths, and outlandish points of conjecture.  Students are therefore urged to not quote any of the below for scholarly research.  Unless you don't live in the United States.  Then, who cares?  Like anyone is gonna know the difference.

This is also kinda long



so you may want to pour yourself a cup of coffee with Bailey’s and get comfortable.  Enjoy!

******** 

    As I perused Twitter

"X"

whatever, and Threads, the more liberal (relatively) version of Twitter,

"X"

Seriously, weird dude, give it a rest.  

Anyway, I read posts from a few people calling to ignore Presidents Day because it will celebrate a particular someone.

"I think he means me. 
Although I am the reincarnation of Lincoln. 
Without the beard."

This was blasted by others who said the day was meant to celebrate George Washington.  Another said, "NO!  It's to celebrate Abraham Lincoln!"

Even though I'd bet I'm more politically aligned with those guys, rather than the one calling for a nationwide boycott, I had to set them straight.

 

Meaning, they'll probably argue about something else.

So, without further adieu...    

    Until fairly recently, there was no such thing as “Presidents” Day.  Rather, we celebrated “Lincoln’s Birthday” on February 12th and “Washington’s Birthday” on February 22nd.  What’s more, these were one shot deals, instead of the three day weekend we now observe. 

    I remember feeling gypped whenever they fell on the weekend, rather than on a school day.  So, we were all gladdened when the feds decided to ignore history and insist that George and Abe were born on Mondays.  Screw ‘em, I guess they figured.  They’re dead anyway.

"Wait.  WTF?"

    Like I said, though, we now have Presidents Day instead of two separate holidays.  Created to make room for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday holiday (no sense giving mailmen too many days off), Presidents Day was meant to commemorate both our 1st and our 16th presidents.  And sales on cars, sheets, and living room furniture.

    So as not to offend either the Washington or Lincoln camps (boy, don’t get those two together in the same room!), Presidents Day was set in the middle of their birthdays.  Or the third Monday in February.  Or whichever made for the better three-day weekend.

    Like Thanksgiving, this made it pretty easy to plan for.  This is in stark contrast to Easter.  Besides knowing that it’s on a Sunday, I have no idea from year to year when Easter will happen.  Something to do with the lunar cycle and first day of spring.  During leap year.  And the Pope consults his Magic 8-Ball.  

Or when Jupiter aligns with Mars.
Old joke.  Sorry.


    In other words, whenever the calendar says.

    As time wore on, Presidents Day transformed into a day to celebrate all of our nation’s chief executives, even the sucky ones.

"You take that back."

     As the concept of Presidents Day caught on, my family tried to come up with a dignified way to recognize the men who guided our nation’s ship of state.

    I have to admit, it was pretty difficult to get all jazzed up for a holiday sandwiched between the saccharine-sweet chocolate debauchery of Valentines Day and the inebriated bacchanalian excesses of St. Patrick’s Day. 

As much fun as that is.
 

    We finally decided on a “Dress as Your Favorite President Day.”  That way, we could suitably honor who it was we most admired as the leader of our country.  And, even though my powdered wig and breeches drew a lot of stares at Home Depot, I felt it was the noble thing to do. 

    This practice worked quite well for a number of years.  That is until my brother, dressed as Bill Clinton, got arrested at the Miss America pageant for goosing Miss February.

    To avoid possible litigation, we then decided to pick a president who was not so well-known.  I mean, how likely would it be that a descendant of Martin Van Buren would call us before Judge Judy for saying their great-great-great-great-grandfather’s head looked like a beachball with feathers?  Not terribly likely.

It really did, though.
  

    To be sure, there are plenty of obscure stiffs from which to choose, guys who could be genuine stumpers in Trivial Pursuit.  In fact, were it not for their bosses catching cold at inauguration, having one heck of a tummyache, being assassinated, dropping dead of heart failure, or resigning, we probably would never have heard of Tyler, Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Coolidge, or Ford.

     Hoping to stand out with my unknown president, I chose a man who was legendary in the Republican Party.  A man who put the needs of his fellow citizens before his own.  A man whose hard work paid off handsomely.  A man who had the fortune of being Vice-President when James Garfield was assassinated in 1881:  Chester Alan Arthur, 21st President of the United States.

Wrong Garfield.

    Known primarily for his facial hair and uncanny ability to remain innocuous, Arthur had the fortune of being Chief Executive during the Gunfight at the OK Corral when Kurt Russell, starring as Wyatt Earp, defeated the Clanton gang with the help of his brothers, Doc Holliday, and a killer moustache.

     Arthur became president the year Alexander Graham Bell perfected the first metal detector.  This was a step up for the beleaguered Bell who previously invented the machine used to try to locate the bullet lodged in Garfield’s body.

And here you thought he was just about the telephone. 
See?  You can learn some things here. 
Not much, but some.  

    With the result that Chester Arthur and his whiskers became president.

    President Arthur was especially opposed to the Spoils System.

"Since those dark times,
science has taught us that milk must be refrigerated, lest it spoil!"


"Anyway."

    A champion of Civil Service reform, because he wanted to avoid “another Civil War” at all costs, Arthur is regarded as the “Father of the Civil Service and the Guaranteed Ten Minute Coffee Break.”

"You can kiss those goodbye!"

    Not content with remaining somnambulant on the domestic front, he furthered his nation’s outreach when the United States established formal diplomatic relations with Korea (thus discovering Ping Pong), organized the Alaskan territory (it was a mess), and continued the process by which land was stolen from Native-Americans and millions of buffalo were slaughtered by gangs of drunks hanging from the windows of passing trains.

    Shockingly, he was denied nomination of his party for the presidential election of 1884.  Evidently, party bigwigs weren’t terribly impressed with neither his record nor his campaign slogan of “At Least I’m Not Millard Fillmore.”

"They didn't say so, but I know it was because of my moustache
and whatever these things on my cheeks are. 
How soon they forget Martin Van Buren, amirite?"

    Instead, they gave the nomination to someone whose name escapes me, but, honestly, who cares?  Whoever he was, he was defeated by the Democrat candidate for the presidency.

    Yes, Grover Cleveland became the 22nd (and, ultimately, 24th) President of the United States primarily on the strength of HIS slogan:  “I May Be Fat as a House, But I Ain’t Chester Arthur.”

    Hmm, maybe next year I’ll choose Franklin Pierce.

"Who?"


 

         

History of the World-VD


    February 14th is a day set aside each year in the name of love and the greeting card industry. For it is on this day* that lovers throughout the world (or at least this country) scour the aisles of supercenters throughout the land in search of that which most fervently expresses their devotion to their significant other. 
"Forget the car.  It's February 13th and I gotta get to Walmart!"
   
    Flowers, chocolates, lingerie, stuffed Cupids, velvet handcuffs, early pregnancy tests...all fly off the shelves, snatched up by those who desperately want to get laid.  At least once this year.
Incidentally, this will probably be the biggest workout
that Lady Schicks get all winter.

  
  But, how did this holiday (one which doesn't involve time off from work or school? Suck it, babies. You got Columbus Day**. Well, some of you. Suck it anyway).  Obviously (or not, for those of you who went to public school), Valentines Day is named in honor of Saint Valentine, he of the Rome Valentines. 

    There are actually many Valentines and, hence, different origin stories. There was, for example, a Valentine of Rome, Terni, and Genoa. 
To say nothing of Valetine of Secaucus, New Jersey.

    But, I'm only going to concentrate on the Valentine of Rome here. Mostly because he's pretty much the only one the nuns taught us about.  Plus, do you really want to read a long-ass post?  Well, hopefully no longer than usual, anyway.  Besides, you gotta get to Walmart (CVS in a pinch) to pick up a box of chocolates shaped like a heart. 

    God speed, you sentimental sap, you!  May your chocolates be more than those sucky jelly-filled ones. 

    Anyway, Valentine was a Roman (I already said that) priest/bishop/fishmonger in the third century under the rule of Claudius II, nicknamed "Claudius the Cruel" behind his back.  As was often the case during the first few centuries of the Roman Empire, persecution of the Christians was a favorite past time along with gladiatorial games, enslaving Germans, and washing togas with urine.  

    Unfortunately, that whole invading bit took quite a bit of manpower to pull off.  And, since free college and sex changes weren't really things in the Roman Army, the emperor needed to find some ways to staff the legions.  
"At first, some Senators wanted to call me 'Claudius Big Nose,' so I had them beheaded.
  So, yeah, that 'Cruel' thing...probably legit."

    One of his beliefs was that a married Roman wouldn't be that keen to travel far from home to conquer people who weren't too keen on being conquered.  Raping and pillaging were pretty much a bachelor-only kind of thing.  

    Valentine disagreed with this philosophy and conducted marriage ceremonies for Christian soldiers.  Claudius (since he was cruel) ordered Valentine arrested for eventual execution (once the check cleared after hiring the executioner). While he was waiting, Valentine restored sight to the blind daughter of his jailer, Julia (the daughter, not the jailer).  A pretty nice thing to do, if you ask me. If I was the jailer, I would have at least accidentally left his cell open in gratitude.
 
"But, you restored her sight after you dropped your tunic.  Perv."

    But nooooooooo, execution by beheading happened on February 14, 296 (once the executioner's visa from Iran was approved). The night before, though, Valentine allegedly left Julia a note saying, "Your Valentine."
"Awwwwwwwww, a letter from Val.  That...is...so...sweet
But did have to include 'Your dad is an asshole.'?"  

NOTE: Now you know where that custom came from.  
 
    A couple hundred years later, Pope Gelasius designated Valentine a saint. Christians by this time were running the show, having given the pagans the heave-ho.
That's okay, though. 
They were probably undocumented Scythians.

   Saints were being made right and left willy-nilly, and Valentine made the cut based on his religious fervor, performance of miracles, and outstanding penmanship. 

NOTE:  Unfortunately, Saint Willy Nilly was one miracle shy.

    The origins of the other traditions associated with Valentines Day remain hazy and probably were generated in lands far and wide from Rome or Hallmark.  Cupid, though, may be based on the possibility that Valentine gave Julia more than a note.
 
If you know what I mean.

    Be honest.  When you first read the title of this post, you expected something completely different, didn't you?

 *That this is the only day designated as such is kind of sad. What do the other 364 days of the year consist of? "HEY, WHERE THE HELL IS MY DINNER?"

**AKA Canadian Thanksgiving

Dick In a Box

No, not the Saturday Night Live skit.
But, I made you check it out.
Come to think of it, this is kinda funny.


No.........


 

Quite a few people are mocking Jaden Smith.
But maybe, just maybe, he's being super savvy. 
Perhaps he's auditioning for a science fiction film about a giant who gets his head stuck in houses. 
Of course, something like this would be more in Johnny Depp's wheelhouse.


"Hey, that's not a bad idea.  Someone get Depp on the phone."

    Of course, not everyone is thrilled with this situation...


"I SAID, GET MY KID'S HEAD OUT YO DAMN HOUSE!!!!





Emotional Damage

 


    As most all of you know, I am a Monetary Exchange Specialist at a store staffed by helpful hardware folk.  Trust me, there is an abundance of source material to be had working there.  So much so that my next book (rather cleverly titled Adventures of a Monetary Exchange Specialist) is based solely on my experiences as a Monetary Exchange Specialist.

"WE GET IT! YOU'RE A CASHIER ALREADY!!!"

    Since I like to commiserate with my fellow Mone...cashiers, I joined a Facebook group, "Working Retail."  Many of the instances there echo quite a few of the experiences that I have.  Some of them are quite funny, but I would never think of plagiarizing them.  As far as you know.  Who do you think I am?  Joe Biden?


    One entry, though, broke my heart because it made me think of the real damage that a parent can do to their child.  In fact (I hope) the mom or dad will probably just forget about it.  Unfortunately, though, that child may never forget what was said to them in what could only have been a temporary (hopefully) bit of crankassery.

    I've copied the post completely below. 

"PLAGIARISM!"


    Actually, I did it so you can understand more clearly what I'm trying to say.

    Or, I'm too lazy to write anything original and chose to sashay (or mosey) down Plagiarism Avenue.


From "Working Retail"...

I don't understand why parents feel the need to shame their kids in the checkout line. It happens quite often but today, I witnessed a particularly stark example. This teenage boy (probably 17-18) and his mom were buying a lot of home decor items, and also like 7-8 cans of paint. The mom was speaking in a very loud voice about how he was spending too much of her money on paint for his "little project." The boy was very respectful, saying "Yes, ma'am," and "No, ma'am," to his mom, and he said repeatedly that he would pay for the paint with his card. She seemed that she'd rather complain about the hole he was burning in her pocket than actually let him buy his own paint. (He did have like $40 worth of paint). In the end she paid for it, announcing loudly "I'm not taking any of the flack from Dad for all of THIS. It's all on you." All she succeeded in doing was making everyone in the line and the cashier (myself) feel quite uncomfortable because of the volume, tone, and attitude she was using towards her rather demure son. I don't know; I don't know why you'd tell your kid you'd pay for something and then make them feel bad about it. It happens more frequently than I would have thought before I started working retail.

  

  I hope to God that I haven't said anything similar to either of my children.  I pray they don't hold on to what I said to them when they're deciding whether to pull the plug or not.

    Although, there was this one time...I didn't say anything harsh but....

    One weekday, I had risen at about 4 am because I needed to be at work early.  After showering, I noticed that I didn't have a towel.  Since it was still dark outside, I figured nobody was awake.  

I normally have a towel. 
Get off my ass.

    So, I waddled, dripping wet, and completely naked, to the kids' bedroom to get something with which to dry off.

   As I reached the door, I noticed light shining from within.

   Before I could finish my thought of "Well, that's odd," my teenage son opened the door and beheld his bareass father.  Choking back revolted bile, he retreated to his bedroom.

   At the same time, I fled in mortified embarrassment to my room, where I dried off with a tee shirt.

    He, on the other hand, is saddled with the mental image of a wet, naked father.  I mean, how gross is that?  Surely, it's an emotional damage which can last for decades.

In other words, I had better keep an eye on the plugs next to my hospital bed.

 


Politically Correct Christmas

Ghosties, Ghoulies, and Things Which Go Bump in the Night

FULL DISCLOSURE :  I was raised a Catholic and was even an altar boy for four years.  However, I'm married to a Jewish girl.  Before tha...